Demographics details for Laurinburg, NC vs Shelton, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurinburg, NC vs Shelton, WA.
| Data | Laurinburg | Shelton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,908 | 10,814 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 31.2 years |
| Median Income | $38,015 | $57,907 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Laurinburg vs Shelton
- In Laurinburg, the population is higher at 14,908, compared to 10,814 in Shelton.
- Residents in Laurinburg have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 31.2 years in Shelton.
- Shelton has a higher median income of $57,907, compared to $38,015 in Laurinburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Laurinburg at 27.0% compared to 25.0% in Shelton.
- Laurinburg has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 12% in Shelton.
- Shelton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 5.2% in Laurinburg.
Demographics
Demographics Laurinburg vs Shelton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laurinburg | Shelton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 49 | 1 |
| White | 32 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
| American Indian | 7 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Laurinburg vs Shelton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Laurinburg at 49% compared to 1% in Shelton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shelton at 61% compared to 32% in Laurinburg.
- Both Laurinburg and Shelton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Shelton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 5% in Laurinburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shelton at 9%, compared to 6% in Laurinburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Laurinburg at 7% compared to 3% in Shelton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laurinburg | Shelton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 20.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 29.0% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 37.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurinburg vs Shelton
- In Shelton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 19.5% in Laurinburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shelton at 29.0% versus 23.8% in Laurinburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Laurinburg at 23.7% compared to 21.9% in Shelton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shelton at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Laurinburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Laurinburg at 44.9% compared to 37.9% in Shelton.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Laurinburg and Shelton at 17.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laurinburg | Shelton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (75) | 2.9% (318) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (2,799) | 14.3% (1,548) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (2,024) | 18.4% (1,988) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (1,826) | 11.2% (1,208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurinburg vs Shelton
- In Shelton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.5% in Laurinburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurinburg hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 14.3% in Shelton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shelton at 18.4%, compared to 13.6% in Laurinburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurinburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 11.2% in Shelton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.