Demographics details for Laurinburg, NC vs Farmington hills, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Laurinburg, NC vs Farmington hills, MI.

Data Laurinburg Farmington hills
Population 14,908 82,737
Median Age 38.1 years 41.6 years
Median Income $38,015 $101,728
Married Families 27.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 21% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 2.8

Population Comparison: Laurinburg vs Farmington hills

  • The population in Farmington hills is higher at 82,737, compared to 14,908 in Laurinburg.
  • The median age in Farmington hills is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 38.1 years in Laurinburg.
  • Farmington hills has a higher median income of $101,728, compared to $38,015 in Laurinburg.
  • In Farmington hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 27.0% in Laurinburg.
  • Laurinburg has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 5% in Farmington hills.
  • The unemployment rate in Laurinburg is higher at 5.2%, compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.

Demographics

Demographics Laurinburg vs Farmington hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Laurinburg Farmington hills
Black 49 18
White 32 59
Asian 1 15
Hispanic 5 2
Two or More Races 6 6
American Indian 7 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Laurinburg vs Farmington hills

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Laurinburg at 49% compared to 18% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington hills at 59% compared to 32% in Laurinburg.
  • In Farmington hills, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 1% in Laurinburg.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Laurinburg at 5% compared to 2% in Farmington hills.
  • Both Laurinburg and Farmington hills have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Laurinburg at 7% compared to 0% in Farmington hills.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Laurinburg Farmington hills
Mental Health Not Good 19.5% 13.6%
Physical Health Not Good 14.7% 8.0%
Depression 23.8% 19.0%
Smoking 23.7% 11.4%
Binge Drinking 14.0% 17.5%
Obesity 44.9% 29.1%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Laurinburg vs Farmington hills

  • More residents in Laurinburg report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Laurinburg at 23.8% compared to 19.0% in Farmington hills.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Laurinburg at 23.7% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmington hills at 17.5% compared to 14.0% in Laurinburg.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Laurinburg at 44.9% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Laurinburg at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Farmington hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Laurinburg Farmington hills
No Schooling 0.5% (75) 0.6% (488)
High School Diploma 18.8% (2,799) 9.5% (7,900)
Less than High School 13.6% (2,024) 6.0% (4,947)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.2% (1,826) 42.2% (34,948)

Education Levels Comparison: Laurinburg vs Farmington hills

  • In Farmington hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Laurinburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Laurinburg hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents in Laurinburg have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 6.0% in Farmington hills.
  • In Farmington hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 12.2% in Laurinburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.