Demographics details for Laurelville, OH vs Newport, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurelville, OH vs Newport, RI.
| Data | Laurelville | Newport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 506 | 24,684 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $50,357 | $81,330 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Laurelville vs Newport
- The population in Newport is higher at 24,684, compared to 506 in Laurelville.
- The median age in Newport is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 36.1 years in Laurelville.
- Newport has a higher median income of $81,330, compared to $50,357 in Laurelville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Laurelville at 41.0% compared to 32.0% in Newport.
- Laurelville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Newport.
- The unemployment rate in Laurelville is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Newport.
Demographics
Demographics Laurelville vs Newport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laurelville | Newport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 8 |
| White | 88 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Laurelville vs Newport
- In Newport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
- Laurelville has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 71% in Newport.
- In Newport, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Laurelville.
- Newport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 0% in Laurelville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Laurelville at 12% compared to 8% in Newport.
- In Newport, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Laurelville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laurelville | Newport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 26.8% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 27.9% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 20.3% |
| Obesity | 45.9% | 27.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurelville vs Newport
- More residents in Laurelville report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 14.7% in Newport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Laurelville at 26.8% compared to 24.6% in Newport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Laurelville at 27.9% compared to 12.4% in Newport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Newport at 20.3% compared to 17.0% in Laurelville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Laurelville at 45.9% compared to 27.8% in Newport.
- Disability percentages are higher in Laurelville at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Newport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laurelville | Newport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (154) |
| High School Diploma | 41.5% (210) | 13.4% (3,298) |
| Less than High School | 18.2% (92) | 6.6% (1,625) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.8% (14) | 36.9% (9,102) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurelville vs Newport
- In Newport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Laurelville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurelville hold a high school diploma at 41.5% compared to 13.4% in Newport.
- More residents in Laurelville have less than a high school education at 18.2% compared to 6.6% in Newport.
- In Newport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.9% compared to 2.8% in Laurelville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.