Demographics details for Laurelville, OH vs Carthage, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurelville, OH vs Carthage, TX.
| Data | Laurelville | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 506 | 6,562 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $50,357 | $42,788 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Laurelville vs Carthage
- The population in Carthage is higher at 6,562, compared to 506 in Laurelville.
- The median age in Carthage is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 36.1 years in Laurelville.
- Laurelville has a higher median income of $50,357 compared to $42,788 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Laurelville at 41.0% compared to 36.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 19%, compared to 12% in Laurelville.
- Carthage has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Laurelville.
Demographics
Demographics Laurelville vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laurelville | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 12 |
| White | 88 | 59 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Laurelville vs Carthage
- In Carthage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
- Laurelville has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 59% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Laurelville.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 0% in Laurelville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Laurelville at 12% compared to 11% in Carthage.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Laurelville and Carthage at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laurelville | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 26.8% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 27.9% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 45.9% | 42.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurelville vs Carthage
- More residents in Laurelville report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 19.1% in Carthage.
- Depression is more prevalent in Laurelville at 26.8% compared to 24.6% in Carthage.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Laurelville at 27.9% compared to 19.6% in Carthage.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carthage at 17.2% compared to 17.0% in Laurelville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Laurelville at 45.9% compared to 42.1% in Carthage.
- Disability percentages are higher in Laurelville at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Carthage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laurelville | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.3% (148) |
| High School Diploma | 41.5% (210) | 10.7% (705) |
| Less than High School | 18.2% (92) | 20.5% (1,343) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.8% (14) | 9.1% (600) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurelville vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Laurelville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurelville hold a high school diploma at 41.5% compared to 10.7% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 20.5%, compared to 18.2% in Laurelville.
- In Carthage, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.1% compared to 2.8% in Laurelville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.