Demographics details for Laurel, MT vs Springfield, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurel, MT vs Springfield, MA.
| Data | Laurel | Springfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,203 | 154,064 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $62,250 | $47,677 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Laurel vs Springfield
- The population in Springfield is higher at 154,064, compared to 7,203 in Laurel.
- Residents in Laurel have a higher median age of 36.5 years compared to 33.4 years in Springfield.
- Laurel has a higher median income of $62,250 compared to $47,677 in Springfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Laurel at 37.0% compared to 26.0% in Springfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Springfield at 20%, compared to 7% in Laurel.
- Springfield has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 3.5% in Laurel.
Demographics
Demographics Laurel vs Springfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laurel | Springfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 21 |
| White | 83 | 8 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 19 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Laurel vs Springfield
- In Springfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 0% in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 8% in Springfield.
- In Springfield, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Laurel.
- Springfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 7% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springfield at 19%, compared to 7% in Laurel.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Laurel at 1% compared to 0% in Springfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laurel | Springfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 21.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 27.8% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.8% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 32.2% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurel vs Springfield
- In Springfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 16.4% in Laurel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Laurel at 27.8% compared to 25.8% in Springfield.
- Springfield has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 15.8% in Laurel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Laurel at 23.8% compared to 14.3% in Springfield.
- Springfield has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 32.2% in Laurel.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springfield at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Laurel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laurel | Springfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (14) | 2.0% (3,005) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,563) | 16.7% (25,679) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (556) | 23.8% (36,663) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (780) | 12.7% (19,500) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurel vs Springfield
- In Springfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.2% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 16.7% in Springfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Springfield at 23.8%, compared to 7.7% in Laurel.
- In Springfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 10.8% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.