Environment details: Laurel MT
poor quality, requires immediate attention.
Environment details: Maysville MO
Water quality is poor due to high sedimentation.
Compare Environment: Laurel MT vs Maysville MO
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Laurel | Maysville |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 228 | 936 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | poor quality, requires immediate attention. | Water quality is poor due to high sedimentation. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.77 | 1.72 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 40 | 32 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Laurel vs Maysville
- Water quality is rated higher in Laurel at 4/10 compared to 3/10 in Maysville.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Laurel with 1.77 compared to 1.72 in Maysville.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Laurel at 40 compared to 32 in Maysville.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.