Demographics details for Laurel, MT vs Marietta, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurel, MT vs Marietta, GA.
| Data | Laurel | Marietta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,203 | 62,602 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $62,250 | $67,589 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Laurel vs Marietta
- The population in Marietta is higher at 62,602, compared to 7,203 in Laurel.
- Residents in Laurel have a higher median age of 36.5 years compared to 35.2 years in Marietta.
- Marietta has a higher median income of $67,589, compared to $62,250 in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Laurel at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Marietta.
- The poverty level is higher in Marietta at 11%, compared to 7% in Laurel.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Laurel and Marietta at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Laurel vs Marietta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laurel | Marietta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 30 |
| White | 83 | 41 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Laurel vs Marietta
- In Marietta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 0% in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 41% in Marietta.
- Both Laurel and Marietta have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Marietta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 7% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Marietta at 8%, compared to 7% in Laurel.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Laurel and Marietta at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laurel | Marietta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 27.8% | 18.1% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 14.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.8% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 32.2% | 32.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurel vs Marietta
- More residents in Laurel report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.1% in Marietta.
- Depression is more prevalent in Laurel at 27.8% compared to 18.1% in Marietta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Laurel at 15.8% compared to 14.5% in Marietta.
- Binge drinking is more common in Laurel at 23.8% compared to 14.5% in Marietta.
- Marietta has higher obesity rates at 32.3% compared to 32.2% in Laurel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Laurel at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Marietta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laurel | Marietta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (14) | 1.8% (1,148) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,563) | 10.0% (6,250) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (556) | 13.1% (8,224) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (780) | 29.9% (18,706) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurel vs Marietta
- In Marietta, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.2% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 10.0% in Marietta.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Marietta at 13.1%, compared to 7.7% in Laurel.
- In Marietta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.9% compared to 10.8% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.