Demographics details for Laurel, MT vs Freeland, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurel, MT vs Freeland, WA.
| Data | Laurel | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,203 | 1,894 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 51.2 years |
| Median Income | $62,250 | $89,868 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Laurel vs Freeland
- In Laurel, the population is higher at 7,203, compared to 1,894 in Freeland.
- The median age in Freeland is higher at 51.2 years, compared to 36.5 years in Laurel.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $89,868, compared to $62,250 in Laurel.
- In Freeland, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 37.0% in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Laurel.
Demographics
Demographics Laurel vs Freeland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laurel | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 83 | 86 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Laurel vs Freeland
- In Freeland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Laurel.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Freeland at 86% compared to 83% in Laurel.
- The Asian population is larger in Laurel at 2% compared to 1% in Freeland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Laurel at 7% compared to 3% in Freeland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Laurel at 7% compared to 6% in Freeland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Laurel and Freeland at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laurel | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 27.8% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.8% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 32.2% | 29.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurel vs Freeland
- More residents in Laurel report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.8% in Freeland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Laurel at 27.8% compared to 25.5% in Freeland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Laurel at 15.8% compared to 11.8% in Freeland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Laurel at 23.8% compared to 18.0% in Freeland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Laurel at 32.2% compared to 29.6% in Freeland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Freeland at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Laurel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laurel | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (14) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,563) | 8.1% (153) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (556) | 8.7% (164) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (780) | 28.9% (548) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurel vs Freeland
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 8.1% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Freeland at 8.7%, compared to 7.7% in Laurel.
- In Freeland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 10.8% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.