Environment details: Laurel MT
poor quality, requires immediate attention.
Environment details: Flint hill VA
water quality is poor because of industrial runoff.
Compare Environment: Laurel MT vs Flint hill VA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Laurel | Flint hill |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 228 | 784 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | poor quality, requires immediate attention. | water quality is poor because of industrial runoff. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.77 | 1.55 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 40 | 23 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Laurel vs Flint hill
- Water quality is rated higher in Laurel at 4/10 compared to 3/10 in Flint hill.
- The median air quality index is lower (worse) in Laurel at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Flint hill.
- The average air quality index is worse in Laurel with 1.77 compared to 1.55 in Flint hill.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Laurel at 40 compared to 23 in Flint hill.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.