Demographics details for Laurel, MT vs Corsicana, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurel, MT vs Corsicana, TX.
| Data | Laurel | Corsicana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,203 | 25,566 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $62,250 | $49,353 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Laurel vs Corsicana
- The population in Corsicana is higher at 25,566, compared to 7,203 in Laurel.
- Residents in Laurel have a higher median age of 36.5 years compared to 34.6 years in Corsicana.
- Laurel has a higher median income of $62,250 compared to $49,353 in Corsicana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Laurel at 37.0% compared to 32.0% in Corsicana.
- The poverty level is higher in Corsicana at 14%, compared to 7% in Laurel.
- Corsicana has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Laurel.
Demographics
Demographics Laurel vs Corsicana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laurel | Corsicana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 17 |
| White | 83 | 38 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Laurel vs Corsicana
- In Corsicana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 38% in Corsicana.
- The Asian population is larger in Laurel at 2% compared to 1% in Corsicana.
- Corsicana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 7% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Corsicana at 10%, compared to 7% in Laurel.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Laurel at 1% compared to 0% in Corsicana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laurel | Corsicana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 27.8% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.8% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 32.2% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurel vs Corsicana
- In Corsicana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.4% in Laurel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Laurel at 27.8% compared to 23.5% in Corsicana.
- Corsicana has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 15.8% in Laurel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Laurel at 23.8% compared to 16.8% in Corsicana.
- Corsicana has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 32.2% in Laurel.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Corsicana at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Laurel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laurel | Corsicana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (14) | 3.7% (957) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,563) | 14.2% (3,633) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (556) | 25.3% (6,461) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (780) | 9.2% (2,357) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurel vs Corsicana
- In Corsicana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.2% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 14.2% in Corsicana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corsicana at 25.3%, compared to 7.7% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.8% compared to 9.2% in Corsicana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.