Demographics details for Laurel, MS vs Taylorsville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurel, MS vs Taylorsville, UT.
| Data | Laurel | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,066 | 57,879 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $36,336 | $81,417 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Laurel vs Taylorsville
- The population in Taylorsville is higher at 57,879, compared to 17,066 in Laurel.
- Residents in Laurel have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417, compared to $36,336 in Laurel.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 29.0% in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- The unemployment rate in Laurel is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Laurel vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laurel | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 66 | 1 |
| White | 28 | 57 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Laurel vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Laurel at 66% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Taylorsville at 57% compared to 28% in Laurel.
- In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Laurel.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 4% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Taylorsville at 9%, compared to 1% in Laurel.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Laurel and Taylorsville at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laurel | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 27.2% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.6% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 44.5% | 32.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurel vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.9% in Laurel.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 27.2% versus 21.8% in Laurel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Laurel at 23.1% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Taylorsville at 15.2% compared to 11.6% in Laurel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Laurel at 44.5% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Laurel at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Taylorsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laurel | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (124) | 1.2% (721) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (2,956) | 16.9% (9,799) |
| Less than High School | 17.5% (2,979) | 15.2% (8,775) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (2,485) | 15.7% (9,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurel vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
- More residents in Laurel have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 14.6% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.