Demographics details for Laurel, MS vs Grand rapids, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurel, MS vs Grand rapids, MI.
| Data | Laurel | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,066 | 196,908 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 31.8 years |
| Median Income | $36,336 | $61,634 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Laurel vs Grand rapids
- The population in Grand rapids is higher at 196,908, compared to 17,066 in Laurel.
- Residents in Laurel have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 31.8 years in Grand rapids.
- Grand rapids has a higher median income of $61,634, compared to $36,336 in Laurel.
- In Grand rapids, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 29.0% in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 14% in Grand rapids.
- The unemployment rate in Laurel is higher at 5.4%, compared to 5.3% in Grand rapids.
Demographics
Demographics Laurel vs Grand rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laurel | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 66 | 18 |
| White | 28 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Laurel vs Grand rapids
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Laurel at 66% compared to 18% in Grand rapids.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand rapids at 51% compared to 28% in Laurel.
- In Grand rapids, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Laurel.
- Grand rapids has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 4% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand rapids at 11%, compared to 1% in Laurel.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Laurel and Grand rapids at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laurel | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.6% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 44.5% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurel vs Grand rapids
- More residents in Laurel report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Grand rapids.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grand rapids at 25.3% versus 21.8% in Laurel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Laurel at 23.1% compared to 17.3% in Grand rapids.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand rapids at 16.7% compared to 11.6% in Laurel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Laurel at 44.5% compared to 34.9% in Grand rapids.
- Disability percentages are higher in Laurel at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Grand rapids.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laurel | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (124) | 1.2% (2,304) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (2,956) | 12.4% (24,420) |
| Less than High School | 17.5% (2,979) | 12.2% (23,971) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (2,485) | 25.6% (50,441) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurel vs Grand rapids
- In Grand rapids, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 12.4% in Grand rapids.
- More residents in Laurel have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 12.2% in Grand rapids.
- In Grand rapids, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 14.6% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.