Demographics details for Laurel, MS vs Fairview heights, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurel, MS vs Fairview heights, IL.
Data | Laurel | Fairview heights |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,066 | 16,324 |
Median Age | 37.6 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $36,336 | $74,038 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Laurel vs Fairview heights
- In Laurel, the population is higher at 17,066, compared to 16,324 in Fairview heights.
- The median age in Fairview heights is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 37.6 years in Laurel.
- Fairview heights has a higher median income of $74,038, compared to $36,336 in Laurel.
- In Fairview heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 29.0% in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 9% in Fairview heights.
- The unemployment rate in Laurel is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.5% in Fairview heights.
Demographics
Demographics Laurel vs Fairview heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Laurel | Fairview heights |
---|---|---|
Black | 66 | 30 |
White | 28 | 54 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Laurel vs Fairview heights
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Laurel at 66% compared to 30% in Fairview heights.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairview heights at 54% compared to 28% in Laurel.
- In Fairview heights, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Laurel.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Laurel at 4% compared to 3% in Fairview heights.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairview heights at 12%, compared to 1% in Laurel.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Laurel at 1% compared to 0% in Fairview heights.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Laurel | Fairview heights |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 10.5% |
Depression | 21.8% | 19.0% |
Smoking | 23.1% | 15.5% |
Binge Drinking | 11.6% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 44.5% | 42.1% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurel vs Fairview heights
- More residents in Laurel report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.3% in Fairview heights.
- Depression is more prevalent in Laurel at 21.8% compared to 19.0% in Fairview heights.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Laurel at 23.1% compared to 15.5% in Fairview heights.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairview heights at 16.8% compared to 11.6% in Laurel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Laurel at 44.5% compared to 42.1% in Fairview heights.
- Disability percentages are higher in Laurel at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Fairview heights.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Laurel | Fairview heights |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (124) | 1.0% (168) |
High School Diploma | 17.3% (2,956) | 14.5% (2,359) |
Less than High School | 17.5% (2,979) | 7.3% (1,187) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (2,485) | 22.0% (3,596) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurel vs Fairview heights
- In Fairview heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 14.5% in Fairview heights.
- More residents in Laurel have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 7.3% in Fairview heights.
- In Fairview heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 14.6% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.