Demographics details for Laurel, MS vs Blairsville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurel, MS vs Blairsville, GA.
Data | Laurel | Blairsville |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,066 | 760 |
Median Age | 37.6 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $36,336 | $21,827 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Laurel vs Blairsville
- In Laurel, the population is higher at 17,066, compared to 760 in Blairsville.
- The median age in Blairsville is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 37.6 years in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher median income of $36,336 compared to $21,827 in Blairsville.
- In Blairsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 29.0% in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 15% in Blairsville.
- The unemployment rate in Laurel is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.5% in Blairsville.
Demographics
Demographics Laurel vs Blairsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Laurel | Blairsville |
---|---|---|
Black | 66 | 13 |
White | 28 | 59 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | 11 |
Demographics Comparison: Laurel vs Blairsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Laurel at 66% compared to 13% in Blairsville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Blairsville at 59% compared to 28% in Laurel.
- Both Laurel and Blairsville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Blairsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 4% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Blairsville at 2%, compared to 1% in Laurel.
- In Blairsville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 11%, compared to 1% in Laurel.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Laurel | Blairsville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 11.6% |
Depression | 21.8% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 23.1% | 17.5% |
Binge Drinking | 11.6% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 44.5% | 33.8% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurel vs Blairsville
- More residents in Laurel report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.9% in Blairsville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Laurel at 21.8% compared to 20.8% in Blairsville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Laurel at 23.1% compared to 17.5% in Blairsville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Blairsville at 18.5% compared to 11.6% in Laurel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Laurel at 44.5% compared to 33.8% in Blairsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Laurel at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Blairsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Laurel | Blairsville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (124) | 1.8% (14) |
High School Diploma | 17.3% (2,956) | 19.2% (146) |
Less than High School | 17.5% (2,979) | 35.0% (266) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (2,485) | 2.1% (16) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurel vs Blairsville
- In Blairsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.7% in Laurel.
- In Blairsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 17.3% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Blairsville at 35.0%, compared to 17.5% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 2.1% in Blairsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.