Demographics details for Laurel, MD vs Panacea, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurel, MD vs Panacea, FL.
| Data | Laurel | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,352 | 1,152 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 46.7 years |
| Median Income | $92,035 | $36,250 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Laurel vs Panacea
- In Laurel, the population is higher at 29,352, compared to 1,152 in Panacea.
- The median age in Panacea is higher at 46.7 years, compared to 36.4 years in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher median income of $92,035 compared to $36,250 in Panacea.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Laurel at 33.0% compared to 30.0% in Panacea.
- The poverty level is higher in Panacea at 10%, compared to 9% in Laurel.
- Panacea has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.4% in Laurel.
Demographics
Demographics Laurel vs Panacea provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laurel | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 52 | Data is updating |
| White | 11 | 99 |
| Asian | 10 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Laurel vs Panacea
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Laurel at 52% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Panacea at 99% compared to 11% in Laurel.
- The Asian population is larger in Laurel at 10% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Laurel at 18% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Laurel at 8% compared to 1% in Panacea.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Laurel at 1% compared to 0% in Panacea.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laurel | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 13.1% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 10.4% | 23.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.4% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 32.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 31.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurel vs Panacea
- In Panacea, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.1% in Laurel.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Panacea at 22.3% versus 13.1% in Laurel.
- Panacea has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 10.4% in Laurel.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Panacea at 17.4% compared to 12.4% in Laurel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Laurel at 36.6% compared to 32.3% in Panacea.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Panacea at 31.0% compared to 7.0% in Laurel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laurel | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (521) | 4.1% (47) |
| High School Diploma | 10.0% (2,934) | 32.5% (374) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (3,616) | 55.4% (638) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.9% (9,081) | 11.9% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurel vs Panacea
- In Panacea, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 1.8% in Laurel.
- In Panacea, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.5% compared to 10.0% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Panacea at 55.4%, compared to 12.3% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.9% compared to 11.9% in Panacea.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.