Demographics details for Laurel, MD vs Charlottesville, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurel, MD vs Charlottesville, VA.
| Data | Laurel | Charlottesville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,352 | 45,373 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $92,035 | $67,177 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Laurel vs Charlottesville
- The population in Charlottesville is higher at 45,373, compared to 29,352 in Laurel.
- Residents in Laurel have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 32.4 years in Charlottesville.
- Laurel has a higher median income of $92,035 compared to $67,177 in Charlottesville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Laurel at 33.0% compared to 30.0% in Charlottesville.
- The poverty level is higher in Charlottesville at 12%, compared to 9% in Laurel.
- The unemployment rate in Laurel is higher at 3.4%, compared to 2.7% in Charlottesville.
Demographics
Demographics Laurel vs Charlottesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laurel | Charlottesville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 52 | 18 |
| White | 11 | 63 |
| Asian | 10 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Laurel vs Charlottesville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Laurel at 52% compared to 18% in Charlottesville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Charlottesville at 63% compared to 11% in Laurel.
- The Asian population is larger in Laurel at 10% compared to 7% in Charlottesville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Laurel at 18% compared to 6% in Charlottesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Laurel at 8% compared to 6% in Charlottesville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Laurel at 1% compared to 0% in Charlottesville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laurel | Charlottesville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 13.1% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 10.4% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.4% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurel vs Charlottesville
- In Charlottesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 13.1% in Laurel.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Charlottesville at 22.4% versus 13.1% in Laurel.
- Charlottesville has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 10.4% in Laurel.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Charlottesville at 16.7% compared to 12.4% in Laurel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Laurel at 36.6% compared to 32.9% in Charlottesville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Charlottesville at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Laurel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laurel | Charlottesville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (521) | 1.1% (495) |
| High School Diploma | 10.0% (2,934) | 7.8% (3,550) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (3,616) | 7.6% (3,427) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.9% (9,081) | 38.2% (17,339) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurel vs Charlottesville
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.1% in Charlottesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel hold a high school diploma at 10.0% compared to 7.8% in Charlottesville.
- More residents in Laurel have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 7.6% in Charlottesville.
- In Charlottesville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.2% compared to 30.9% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.