Demographics details for Laurel, MD vs Brookhaven, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurel, MD vs Brookhaven, MS.
| Data | Laurel | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,352 | 11,608 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $92,035 | $32,869 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Laurel vs Brookhaven
- In Laurel, the population is higher at 29,352, compared to 11,608 in Brookhaven.
- The median age in Brookhaven is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 36.4 years in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher median income of $92,035 compared to $32,869 in Brookhaven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Laurel at 33.0% compared to 28.0% in Brookhaven.
- The poverty level is higher in Brookhaven at 20%, compared to 9% in Laurel.
- Brookhaven has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.4% in Laurel.
Demographics
Demographics Laurel vs Brookhaven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laurel | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 52 | 57 |
| White | 11 | 39 |
| Asian | 10 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Laurel vs Brookhaven
- In Brookhaven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 52% in Laurel.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brookhaven at 39% compared to 11% in Laurel.
- The Asian population is larger in Laurel at 10% compared to 2% in Brookhaven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Laurel at 18% compared to 2% in Brookhaven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Laurel at 8% compared to 0% in Brookhaven.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Laurel at 1% compared to 0% in Brookhaven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laurel | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 13.1% | 21.5% |
| Smoking | 10.4% | 21.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.4% | 12.4% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 45.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurel vs Brookhaven
- In Brookhaven, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 13.1% in Laurel.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brookhaven at 21.5% versus 13.1% in Laurel.
- Brookhaven has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 10.4% in Laurel.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Laurel and Brookhaven at 12.4%.
- Brookhaven has higher obesity rates at 45.4% compared to 36.6% in Laurel.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brookhaven at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Laurel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laurel | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (521) | 0.8% (96) |
| High School Diploma | 10.0% (2,934) | 19.7% (2,281) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (3,616) | 11.7% (1,357) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.9% (9,081) | 14.6% (1,696) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurel vs Brookhaven
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Brookhaven.
- In Brookhaven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 10.0% in Laurel.
- More residents in Laurel have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 11.7% in Brookhaven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.9% compared to 14.6% in Brookhaven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.