Demographics details for Laurel, IN vs Russell springs, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laurel, IN vs Russell springs, KY.
| Data | Laurel | Russell springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 411 | 2,750 |
| Median Age | 27.8 years | 44.8 years |
| Median Income | $23,125 | $34,219 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Laurel vs Russell springs
- The population in Russell springs is higher at 2,750, compared to 411 in Laurel.
- The median age in Russell springs is higher at 44.8 years, compared to 27.8 years in Laurel.
- Russell springs has a higher median income of $34,219, compared to $23,125 in Laurel.
- In Russell springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 25.0% in Laurel.
- The poverty level is higher in Russell springs at 15%, compared to 11% in Laurel.
- Russell springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Laurel.
Demographics
Demographics Laurel vs Russell springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laurel | Russell springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 1 |
| White | 74 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Laurel vs Russell springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Laurel at 5% compared to 1% in Russell springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Russell springs at 88% compared to 74% in Laurel.
- Both Laurel and Russell springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Russell springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Laurel.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Laurel at 21% compared to 8% in Russell springs.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Laurel and Russell springs at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laurel | Russell springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 20.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 27.9% | 29.0% |
| Smoking | 26.2% | 25.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laurel vs Russell springs
- In Russell springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 19.6% in Laurel.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Russell springs at 29.0% versus 27.9% in Laurel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Laurel at 26.2% compared to 25.6% in Russell springs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Laurel at 17.0% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
- Russell springs has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 37.5% in Laurel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Laurel at 23.0% compared to 15.0% in Russell springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laurel | Russell springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (2) | 0.7% (20) |
| High School Diploma | 30.7% (126) | 13.6% (375) |
| Less than High School | 47.9% (197) | 23.3% (642) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.9% (8) | 18.4% (505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laurel vs Russell springs
- In Russell springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laurel hold a high school diploma at 30.7% compared to 13.6% in Russell springs.
- More residents in Laurel have less than a high school education at 47.9% compared to 23.3% in Russell springs.
- In Russell springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 1.9% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.