Demographics details for Lauderhill, FL vs Navajo dam, NM

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lauderhill, FL vs Navajo dam, NM.

Data Lauderhill Navajo dam
Population 73,633 330
Median Age 37.0 years 36.6 years
Median Income $48,523 $63,375
Married Families 28.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 16% 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 3.5

Population Comparison: Lauderhill vs Navajo dam

  • In Lauderhill, the population is higher at 73,633, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
  • Residents in Lauderhill have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 36.6 years in Navajo dam.
  • Navajo dam has a higher median income of $63,375, compared to $48,523 in Lauderhill.
  • In Navajo dam, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 28.0% in Lauderhill.
  • Lauderhill has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 14% in Navajo dam.
  • The unemployment rate in Lauderhill is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.5% in Navajo dam.

Demographics

Demographics Lauderhill vs Navajo dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lauderhill Navajo dam
Black 80 Data is updating
White 3 16
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 9 67
Two or More Races 6 11
American Indian Data is updating 6

Demographics Comparison: Lauderhill vs Navajo dam

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lauderhill at 80% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Navajo dam at 16% compared to 3% in Lauderhill.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lauderhill at 2% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
  • Navajo dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 67%, compared to 9% in Lauderhill.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Navajo dam at 11%, compared to 6% in Lauderhill.
  • In Navajo dam, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Lauderhill.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lauderhill Navajo dam
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 13.5% 11.2%
Depression 17.0% 17.8%
Smoking 22.9% 15.0%
Binge Drinking 12.1% 14.1%
Obesity 37.0% 32.6%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lauderhill vs Navajo dam

  • More residents in Lauderhill report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 15.2% in Navajo dam.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Navajo dam at 17.8% versus 17.0% in Lauderhill.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lauderhill at 22.9% compared to 15.0% in Navajo dam.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Navajo dam at 14.1% compared to 12.1% in Lauderhill.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lauderhill at 37.0% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Lauderhill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lauderhill Navajo dam
No Schooling 2.1% (1,544) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 22.7% (16,679) 4.8% (16)
Less than High School 10.9% (8,046) 6.1% (20)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.4% (9,833) 22.7% (75)

Education Levels Comparison: Lauderhill vs Navajo dam

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lauderhill have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lauderhill hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
  • More residents in Lauderhill have less than a high school education at 10.9% compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
  • In Navajo dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 13.4% in Lauderhill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.