Demographics details for Latah, WA vs New cambria, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Latah, WA vs New cambria, KS.
| Data | Latah | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 176 | 104 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 30.7 years |
| Median Income | $46,563 | $83,601 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Latah vs New cambria
- In Latah, the population is higher at 176, compared to 104 in New cambria.
- Residents in Latah have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 30.7 years in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher median income of $83,601, compared to $46,563 in Latah.
- In New cambria, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 23.0% in Latah.
- The poverty level is higher in New cambria at 9%, compared to 0% in Latah.
- The unemployment rate in Latah is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in New cambria.
Demographics
Demographics Latah vs New cambria provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Latah | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 89 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Latah vs New cambria
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Latah at 2% compared to 0% in New cambria.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New cambria at 96% compared to 89% in Latah.
- In New cambria, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Latah.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Latah at 4% compared to 1% in New cambria.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Latah at 5% compared to 1% in New cambria.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Latah and New cambria at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Latah | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 29.5% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 16.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 38.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Latah vs New cambria
- More residents in Latah report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.3% in New cambria.
- Depression is more prevalent in Latah at 29.5% compared to 20.8% in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher smoking rate at 16.5% compared to 15.3% in Latah.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New cambria at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Latah.
- New cambria has higher obesity rates at 33.7% compared to 30.2% in Latah.
- Disability percentages are higher in Latah at 38.0% compared to 12.0% in New cambria.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Latah | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 26.7% (47) | 18.3% (19) |
| Less than High School | 0.6% (1) | 3.8% (4) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (21) | 8.7% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Latah vs New cambria
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Latah and New cambria at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Latah hold a high school diploma at 26.7% compared to 18.3% in New cambria.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New cambria at 3.8%, compared to 0.6% in Latah.
- A higher percentage of residents in Latah hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 8.7% in New cambria.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.