Demographics details for Las cruces, NM vs Shafter, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Las cruces, NM vs Shafter, CA.
| Data | Las cruces | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 113,888 | 21,282 |
| Median Age | 31.8 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $51,013 | $66,418 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Las cruces vs Shafter
- In Las cruces, the population is higher at 113,888, compared to 21,282 in Shafter.
- Residents in Las cruces have a higher median age of 31.8 years compared to 27.4 years in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher median income of $66,418, compared to $51,013 in Las cruces.
- In Shafter, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 29.0% in Las cruces.
- Las cruces has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 20% in Shafter.
- The unemployment rate in Las cruces is higher at 5.2%, compared to 5.1% in Shafter.
Demographics
Demographics Las cruces vs Shafter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Las cruces | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 16 | -9 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 60 | 78 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 27 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Las cruces vs Shafter
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Las cruces at 3% compared to 2% in Shafter.
- Las cruces has a higher percentage of White residents at 16% compared to -9% in Shafter.
- The Asian population is larger in Las cruces at 2% compared to 1% in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 78%, compared to 60% in Las cruces.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shafter at 27%, compared to 17% in Las cruces.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Las cruces at 2% compared to 1% in Shafter.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Las cruces | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 36.0% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Las cruces vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 16.0% in Las cruces.
- Depression is more prevalent in Las cruces at 21.0% compared to 19.7% in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 16.1% in Las cruces.
- Binge drinking is more common in Las cruces at 15.0% compared to 14.9% in Shafter.
- Shafter has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 36.0% in Las cruces.
- Disability percentages are higher in Las cruces at 15.0% compared to 6.0% in Shafter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Las cruces | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (935) | 2.7% (567) |
| High School Diploma | 10.2% (11,602) | 14.1% (2,992) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (15,958) | 32.9% (6,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (24,688) | 5.7% (1,217) |
Education Levels Comparison: Las cruces vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.8% in Las cruces.
- In Shafter, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.1% compared to 10.2% in Las cruces.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shafter at 32.9%, compared to 14.0% in Las cruces.
- A higher percentage of residents in Las cruces hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 5.7% in Shafter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.