Demographics details for Lansing, MI vs Sparks, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lansing, MI vs Sparks, NV.
Data | Lansing | Sparks |
---|---|---|
Population | 112,537 | 109,226 |
Median Age | 32.9 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $50,747 | $82,938 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Lansing vs Sparks
- In Lansing, the population is higher at 112,537, compared to 109,226 in Sparks.
- The median age in Sparks is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 32.9 years in Lansing.
- Sparks has a higher median income of $82,938, compared to $50,747 in Lansing.
- In Sparks, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 28.0% in Lansing.
- Lansing has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 10% in Sparks.
- The unemployment rate in Lansing is higher at 7.4%, compared to 5.0% in Sparks.
Demographics
Demographics Lansing vs Sparks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lansing | Sparks |
---|---|---|
Black | 24 | 2 |
White | 48 | 43 |
Asian | 5 | 5 |
Hispanic | 13 | 34 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lansing vs Sparks
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lansing at 24% compared to 2% in Sparks.
- Lansing has a higher percentage of White residents at 48% compared to 43% in Sparks.
- Both Lansing and Sparks have the same percentage of Asian residents at 5%.
- Sparks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 13% in Lansing.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sparks at 15%, compared to 10% in Lansing.
- In Sparks, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lansing.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lansing | Sparks |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 12.1% |
Depression | 26.3% | 19.9% |
Smoking | 19.6% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 40.7% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lansing vs Sparks
- More residents in Lansing report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.3% in Sparks.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lansing at 26.3% compared to 19.9% in Sparks.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lansing at 19.6% compared to 17.0% in Sparks.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sparks at 17.9% compared to 16.0% in Lansing.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lansing at 40.7% compared to 28.6% in Sparks.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lansing at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Sparks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lansing | Sparks |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (1,419) | 1.4% (1,548) |
High School Diploma | 13.5% (15,216) | 14.7% (16,026) |
Less than High School | 10.0% (11,269) | 18.1% (19,717) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (21,667) | 16.9% (18,457) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lansing vs Sparks
- In Sparks, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.3% in Lansing.
- In Sparks, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.7% compared to 13.5% in Lansing.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sparks at 18.1%, compared to 10.0% in Lansing.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lansing hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 16.9% in Sparks.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.