Demographics details for Lansing, MI vs Klamath falls, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lansing, MI vs Klamath falls, OR.
Data | Lansing | Klamath falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 112,537 | 21,977 |
Median Age | 32.9 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $50,747 | $46,695 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.4 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Lansing vs Klamath falls
- In Lansing, the population is higher at 112,537, compared to 21,977 in Klamath falls.
- The median age in Klamath falls is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 32.9 years in Lansing.
- Lansing has a higher median income of $50,747 compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
- In Klamath falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 28.0% in Lansing.
- Lansing has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 18% in Klamath falls.
- The unemployment rate in Lansing is higher at 7.4%, compared to 5.2% in Klamath falls.
Demographics
Demographics Lansing vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lansing | Klamath falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 24 | 1 |
White | 48 | 69 |
Asian | 5 | 1 |
Hispanic | 13 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Lansing vs Klamath falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lansing at 24% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Klamath falls at 69% compared to 48% in Lansing.
- The Asian population is larger in Lansing at 5% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 13% in Lansing.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klamath falls at 11%, compared to 10% in Lansing.
- In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Lansing.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lansing | Klamath falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 13.4% |
Depression | 26.3% | 28.4% |
Smoking | 19.6% | 19.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 15.8% |
Obesity | 40.7% | 35.9% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lansing vs Klamath falls
- In Klamath falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.3% in Lansing.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Klamath falls at 28.4% versus 26.3% in Lansing.
- Klamath falls has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 19.6% in Lansing.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lansing at 16.0% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lansing at 40.7% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Lansing.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lansing | Klamath falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (1,419) | 0.9% (192) |
High School Diploma | 13.5% (15,216) | 16.0% (3,508) |
Less than High School | 10.0% (11,269) | 15.5% (3,401) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (21,667) | 14.4% (3,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lansing vs Klamath falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Lansing have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.9% in Klamath falls.
- In Klamath falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 13.5% in Lansing.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Klamath falls at 15.5%, compared to 10.0% in Lansing.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lansing hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.