Demographics details for Lansing, MI vs Klamath falls, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lansing, MI vs Klamath falls, OR.

Data Lansing Klamath falls
Population 112,537 21,977
Median Age 32.9 years 35.1 years
Median Income $50,747 $46,695
Married Families 28.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 19% 18%
Unemployment Rate 7.4 5.2

Population Comparison: Lansing vs Klamath falls

  • In Lansing, the population is higher at 112,537, compared to 21,977 in Klamath falls.
  • The median age in Klamath falls is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 32.9 years in Lansing.
  • Lansing has a higher median income of $50,747 compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
  • In Klamath falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 28.0% in Lansing.
  • Lansing has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 18% in Klamath falls.
  • The unemployment rate in Lansing is higher at 7.4%, compared to 5.2% in Klamath falls.

Demographics

Demographics Lansing vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lansing Klamath falls
Black 24 1
White 48 69
Asian 5 1
Hispanic 13 15
Two or More Races 10 11
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Lansing vs Klamath falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lansing at 24% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Klamath falls at 69% compared to 48% in Lansing.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lansing at 5% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
  • Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 13% in Lansing.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klamath falls at 11%, compared to 10% in Lansing.
  • In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Lansing.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lansing Klamath falls
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% 13.4%
Depression 26.3% 28.4%
Smoking 19.6% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 16.0% 15.8%
Obesity 40.7% 35.9%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lansing vs Klamath falls

  • In Klamath falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.3% in Lansing.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Klamath falls at 28.4% versus 26.3% in Lansing.
  • Klamath falls has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 19.6% in Lansing.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lansing at 16.0% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lansing at 40.7% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Lansing.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lansing Klamath falls
No Schooling 1.3% (1,419) 0.9% (192)
High School Diploma 13.5% (15,216) 16.0% (3,508)
Less than High School 10.0% (11,269) 15.5% (3,401)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.3% (21,667) 14.4% (3,175)

Education Levels Comparison: Lansing vs Klamath falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lansing have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.9% in Klamath falls.
  • In Klamath falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 13.5% in Lansing.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Klamath falls at 15.5%, compared to 10.0% in Lansing.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lansing hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.