Demographics details for Lansing, MI vs Kenansville, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lansing, MI vs Kenansville, NC.
| Data | Lansing | Kenansville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,537 | 759 |
| Median Age | 32.9 years | 48.4 years |
| Median Income | $50,747 | $53,750 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lansing vs Kenansville
- In Lansing, the population is higher at 112,537, compared to 759 in Kenansville.
- The median age in Kenansville is higher at 48.4 years, compared to 32.9 years in Lansing.
- Kenansville has a higher median income of $53,750, compared to $50,747 in Lansing.
- In Kenansville, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 28.0% in Lansing.
- Lansing has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 15% in Kenansville.
- The unemployment rate in Lansing is higher at 7.4%, compared to 4.2% in Kenansville.
Demographics
Demographics Lansing vs Kenansville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lansing | Kenansville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 24 | 20 |
| White | 48 | 61 |
| Asian | 5 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lansing vs Kenansville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lansing at 24% compared to 20% in Kenansville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kenansville at 61% compared to 48% in Lansing.
- In Kenansville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 5% in Lansing.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lansing at 13% compared to 6% in Kenansville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lansing at 10% compared to 6% in Kenansville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lansing and Kenansville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lansing | Kenansville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lansing vs Kenansville
- More residents in Lansing report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.4% in Kenansville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lansing at 26.3% compared to 24.3% in Kenansville.
- Kenansville has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 19.6% in Lansing.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lansing at 16.0% compared to 15.6% in Kenansville.
- Kenansville has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 40.7% in Lansing.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kenansville at 26.0% compared to 17.0% in Lansing.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lansing | Kenansville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (1,419) | 1.6% (12) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (15,216) | 24.0% (182) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (11,269) | 13.8% (105) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (21,667) | 22.5% (171) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lansing vs Kenansville
- In Kenansville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.3% in Lansing.
- In Kenansville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.0% compared to 13.5% in Lansing.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kenansville at 13.8%, compared to 10.0% in Lansing.
- In Kenansville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 19.3% in Lansing.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.