Demographics details for Lansing, MI vs Jeffersonville, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lansing, MI vs Jeffersonville, IN.
| Data | Lansing | Jeffersonville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,537 | 51,030 |
| Median Age | 32.9 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $50,747 | $67,566 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.4 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Lansing vs Jeffersonville
- In Lansing, the population is higher at 112,537, compared to 51,030 in Jeffersonville.
- The median age in Jeffersonville is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 32.9 years in Lansing.
- Jeffersonville has a higher median income of $67,566, compared to $50,747 in Lansing.
- In Jeffersonville, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 28.0% in Lansing.
- Lansing has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 10% in Jeffersonville.
- The unemployment rate in Lansing is higher at 7.4%, compared to 4.1% in Jeffersonville.
Demographics
Demographics Lansing vs Jeffersonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lansing | Jeffersonville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 24 | 12 |
| White | 48 | 75 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lansing vs Jeffersonville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lansing at 24% compared to 12% in Jeffersonville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jeffersonville at 75% compared to 48% in Lansing.
- The Asian population is larger in Lansing at 5% compared to 1% in Jeffersonville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lansing at 13% compared to 5% in Jeffersonville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lansing at 10% compared to 7% in Jeffersonville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lansing and Jeffersonville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lansing | Jeffersonville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lansing vs Jeffersonville
- More residents in Lansing report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.3% in Jeffersonville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lansing at 26.3% compared to 23.5% in Jeffersonville.
- Jeffersonville has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 19.6% in Lansing.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jeffersonville at 16.9% compared to 16.0% in Lansing.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lansing at 40.7% compared to 40.2% in Jeffersonville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lansing at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Jeffersonville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lansing | Jeffersonville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (1,419) | 0.6% (293) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (15,216) | 18.6% (9,472) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (11,269) | 9.7% (4,952) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (21,667) | 16.9% (8,649) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lansing vs Jeffersonville
- A higher percentage of residents in Lansing have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Jeffersonville.
- In Jeffersonville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 13.5% in Lansing.
- More residents in Lansing have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 9.7% in Jeffersonville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lansing hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 16.9% in Jeffersonville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.