Demographics details for Lansing, MI vs Fort morgan, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lansing, MI vs Fort morgan, CO.
Data | Lansing | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
Population | 112,537 | 11,453 |
Median Age | 32.9 years | 32.8 years |
Median Income | $50,747 | $55,407 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.4 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Lansing vs Fort morgan
- In Lansing, the population is higher at 112,537, compared to 11,453 in Fort morgan.
- Residents in Lansing have a higher median age of 32.9 years compared to 32.8 years in Fort morgan.
- Fort morgan has a higher median income of $55,407, compared to $50,747 in Lansing.
- In Fort morgan, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 28.0% in Lansing.
- Lansing has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 11% in Fort morgan.
- The unemployment rate in Lansing is higher at 7.4%, compared to 2.5% in Fort morgan.
Demographics
Demographics Lansing vs Fort morgan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lansing | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
Black | 24 | 8 |
White | 48 | 16 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 13 | 49 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 23 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Lansing vs Fort morgan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lansing at 24% compared to 8% in Fort morgan.
- Lansing has a higher percentage of White residents at 48% compared to 16% in Fort morgan.
- The Asian population is larger in Lansing at 5% compared to 0% in Fort morgan.
- Fort morgan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 13% in Lansing.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort morgan at 23%, compared to 10% in Lansing.
- In Fort morgan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Lansing.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lansing | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 13.5% |
Depression | 26.3% | 21.7% |
Smoking | 19.6% | 18.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 40.7% | 29.3% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lansing vs Fort morgan
- More residents in Lansing report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.0% in Fort morgan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lansing at 26.3% compared to 21.7% in Fort morgan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lansing at 19.6% compared to 18.7% in Fort morgan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort morgan at 17.6% compared to 16.0% in Lansing.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lansing at 40.7% compared to 29.3% in Fort morgan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lansing at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort morgan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lansing | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (1,419) | 4.3% (496) |
High School Diploma | 13.5% (15,216) | 16.0% (1,831) |
Less than High School | 10.0% (11,269) | 25.8% (2,957) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (21,667) | 11.5% (1,312) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lansing vs Fort morgan
- In Fort morgan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 1.3% in Lansing.
- In Fort morgan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 13.5% in Lansing.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort morgan at 25.8%, compared to 10.0% in Lansing.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lansing hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 11.5% in Fort morgan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.