Demographics details for Lansing, MI vs Fairfield, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lansing, MI vs Fairfield, IA.
| Data | Lansing | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,537 | 9,464 |
| Median Age | 32.9 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $50,747 | $44,277 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lansing vs Fairfield
- In Lansing, the population is higher at 112,537, compared to 9,464 in Fairfield.
- The median age in Fairfield is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 32.9 years in Lansing.
- Lansing has a higher median income of $50,747 compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 28.0% in Lansing.
- Lansing has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 12% in Fairfield.
- The unemployment rate in Lansing is higher at 7.4%, compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Lansing vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lansing | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 24 | 8 |
| White | 48 | 73 |
| Asian | 5 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lansing vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lansing at 24% compared to 8% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairfield at 73% compared to 48% in Lansing.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 5% in Lansing.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lansing at 13% compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lansing at 10% compared to 4% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lansing.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lansing | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lansing vs Fairfield
- More residents in Lansing report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.5% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lansing at 26.3% compared to 20.1% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lansing at 19.6% compared to 17.1% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 16.0% in Lansing.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lansing at 40.7% compared to 36.6% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lansing at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lansing | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (1,419) | 0.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (15,216) | 12.1% (1,145) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (11,269) | 6.3% (594) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (21,667) | 38.1% (3,604) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lansing vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Lansing have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lansing hold a high school diploma at 13.5% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Lansing have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 19.3% in Lansing.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.