Demographics details for Lanett, AL vs Tehachapi, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lanett, AL vs Tehachapi, CA.
| Data | Lanett | Tehachapi |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,759 | 12,389 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $48,125 | $62,788 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Lanett vs Tehachapi
- The population in Tehachapi is higher at 12,389, compared to 6,759 in Lanett.
- Residents in Lanett have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 38.3 years in Tehachapi.
- Tehachapi has a higher median income of $62,788, compared to $48,125 in Lanett.
- In Tehachapi, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 24.0% in Lanett.
- The poverty level is higher in Tehachapi at 11%, compared to 0% in Lanett.
- Tehachapi has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.2% in Lanett.
Demographics
Demographics Lanett vs Tehachapi provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lanett | Tehachapi |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 7 |
| White | 16 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Lanett vs Tehachapi
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lanett at 73% compared to 7% in Tehachapi.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tehachapi at 37% compared to 16% in Lanett.
- In Tehachapi, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Lanett.
- Tehachapi has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 8% in Lanett.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tehachapi at 12%, compared to 3% in Lanett.
- In Tehachapi, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Lanett.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lanett | Tehachapi |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 46.5% | 35.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lanett vs Tehachapi
- More residents in Lanett report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Tehachapi.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lanett at 22.1% compared to 17.6% in Tehachapi.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lanett at 21.6% compared to 16.4% in Tehachapi.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tehachapi at 18.7% compared to 12.7% in Lanett.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lanett at 46.5% compared to 35.2% in Tehachapi.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lanett at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Tehachapi.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lanett | Tehachapi |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (90) | 1.4% (172) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (1,277) | 13.3% (1,649) |
| Less than High School | 20.3% (1,369) | 27.7% (3,437) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.4% (498) | 10.9% (1,354) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lanett vs Tehachapi
- In Tehachapi, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.3% in Lanett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lanett hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 13.3% in Tehachapi.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tehachapi at 27.7%, compared to 20.3% in Lanett.
- In Tehachapi, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 7.4% in Lanett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.