Demographics details for Lanett, AL vs Senecaville, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lanett, AL vs Senecaville, OH.

Data Lanett Senecaville
Population 6,759 415
Median Age 39.9 years 36.4 years
Median Income $48,125 $48,036
Married Families 24.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Lanett vs Senecaville

  • In Lanett, the population is higher at 6,759, compared to 415 in Senecaville.
  • Residents in Lanett have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 36.4 years in Senecaville.
  • Lanett has a higher median income of $48,125 compared to $48,036 in Senecaville.
  • In Senecaville, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 24.0% in Lanett.
  • The poverty level is higher in Senecaville at 10%, compared to 0% in Lanett.
  • Senecaville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Lanett.

Demographics

Demographics Lanett vs Senecaville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lanett Senecaville
Black 73 3
White 16 89
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 8 1
Two or More Races 3 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lanett vs Senecaville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lanett at 73% compared to 3% in Senecaville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Senecaville at 89% compared to 16% in Lanett.
  • Both Lanett and Senecaville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Lanett at 8% compared to 1% in Senecaville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Senecaville at 7%, compared to 3% in Lanett.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lanett and Senecaville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lanett Senecaville
Mental Health Not Good 20.0% 18.4%
Physical Health Not Good 14.6% 13.1%
Depression 22.1% 24.5%
Smoking 21.6% 22.6%
Binge Drinking 12.7% 18.7%
Obesity 46.5% 42.9%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lanett vs Senecaville

  • More residents in Lanett report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 18.4% in Senecaville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Senecaville at 24.5% versus 22.1% in Lanett.
  • Senecaville has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 21.6% in Lanett.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Senecaville at 18.7% compared to 12.7% in Lanett.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lanett at 46.5% compared to 42.9% in Senecaville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Senecaville at 26.0% compared to 22.0% in Lanett.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lanett Senecaville
No Schooling 1.3% (90) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 18.9% (1,277) 31.3% (130)
Less than High School 20.3% (1,369) 19.3% (80)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.4% (498) 5.3% (22)

Education Levels Comparison: Lanett vs Senecaville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lanett have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Senecaville.
  • In Senecaville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.3% compared to 18.9% in Lanett.
  • More residents in Lanett have less than a high school education at 20.3% compared to 19.3% in Senecaville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lanett hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.4% compared to 5.3% in Senecaville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.