Demographics details for Lanett, AL vs New riegel, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lanett, AL vs New riegel, OH.
| Data | Lanett | New riegel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,759 | 282 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 32.3 years |
| Median Income | $48,125 | $57,500 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Lanett vs New riegel
- In Lanett, the population is higher at 6,759, compared to 282 in New riegel.
- Residents in Lanett have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 32.3 years in New riegel.
- New riegel has a higher median income of $57,500, compared to $48,125 in Lanett.
- In New riegel, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 24.0% in Lanett.
- The poverty level is higher in New riegel at 6%, compared to 0% in Lanett.
- The unemployment rate in Lanett is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in New riegel.
Demographics
Demographics Lanett vs New riegel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lanett | New riegel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | Data is updating |
| White | 16 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lanett vs New riegel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lanett at 73% compared to 0% in New riegel.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New riegel at 69% compared to 16% in Lanett.
- Both Lanett and New riegel have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- New riegel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 8% in Lanett.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New riegel at 10%, compared to 3% in Lanett.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lanett and New riegel at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lanett | New riegel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 46.5% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lanett vs New riegel
- More residents in Lanett report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.3% in New riegel.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New riegel at 22.8% versus 22.1% in Lanett.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lanett at 21.6% compared to 19.3% in New riegel.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New riegel at 19.4% compared to 12.7% in Lanett.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lanett at 46.5% compared to 39.6% in New riegel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lanett at 22.0% compared to 18.0% in New riegel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lanett | New riegel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (90) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (1,277) | 27.7% (78) |
| Less than High School | 20.3% (1,369) | 12.8% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.4% (498) | 11.3% (32) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lanett vs New riegel
- A higher percentage of residents in Lanett have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in New riegel.
- In New riegel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.7% compared to 18.9% in Lanett.
- More residents in Lanett have less than a high school education at 20.3% compared to 12.8% in New riegel.
- In New riegel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 7.4% in Lanett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.