Demographics details for Lanett, AL vs Elizabethton, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lanett, AL vs Elizabethton, TN.
Data | Lanett | Elizabethton |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,759 | 14,244 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 39.4 years |
Median Income | $48,125 | $44,252 |
Married Families | 24.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lanett vs Elizabethton
- The population in Elizabethton is higher at 14,244, compared to 6,759 in Lanett.
- Residents in Lanett have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 39.4 years in Elizabethton.
- Lanett has a higher median income of $48,125 compared to $44,252 in Elizabethton.
- In Elizabethton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 24.0% in Lanett.
- The poverty level is higher in Elizabethton at 14%, compared to 0% in Lanett.
- Elizabethton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Lanett.
Demographics
Demographics Lanett vs Elizabethton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lanett | Elizabethton |
---|---|---|
Black | 73 | 6 |
White | 16 | 86 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 8 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lanett vs Elizabethton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lanett at 73% compared to 6% in Elizabethton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Elizabethton at 86% compared to 16% in Lanett.
- In Elizabethton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Lanett.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lanett at 8% compared to 3% in Elizabethton.
- Both Lanett and Elizabethton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- In Elizabethton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lanett.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lanett | Elizabethton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 21.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 15.2% |
Depression | 22.1% | 31.5% |
Smoking | 21.6% | 25.0% |
Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 46.5% | 39.1% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lanett vs Elizabethton
- In Elizabethton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 20.0% in Lanett.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Elizabethton at 31.5% versus 22.1% in Lanett.
- Elizabethton has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 21.6% in Lanett.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Elizabethton at 14.7% compared to 12.7% in Lanett.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lanett at 46.5% compared to 39.1% in Elizabethton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lanett at 22.0% compared to 20.0% in Elizabethton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lanett | Elizabethton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (90) | 0.5% (75) |
High School Diploma | 18.9% (1,277) | 17.7% (2,527) |
Less than High School | 20.3% (1,369) | 16.7% (2,377) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.4% (498) | 17.0% (2,422) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lanett vs Elizabethton
- A higher percentage of residents in Lanett have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.5% in Elizabethton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lanett hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 17.7% in Elizabethton.
- More residents in Lanett have less than a high school education at 20.3% compared to 16.7% in Elizabethton.
- In Elizabethton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 7.4% in Lanett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.