Demographics details for Lancaster, VA vs Union city, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, VA vs Union city, GA.
| Data | Lancaster | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,750 | 27,895 |
| Median Age | 59.2 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $62,674 | $46,696 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Union city
- The population in Union city is higher at 27,895, compared to 10,750 in Lancaster.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 59.2 years compared to 32.7 years in Union city.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $62,674 compared to $46,696 in Union city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 46.0% compared to 17.0% in Union city.
- The poverty level is higher in Union city at 16%, compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 85 |
| White | 66 | 6 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 85% compared to 28% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 6% in Union city.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 1% compared to 0% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Union city at 4%, compared to 3% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Union city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Union city
- In Union city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.4% in Lancaster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 22.2% compared to 17.2% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 16.4% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 16.3% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 37.3% compared to 36.6% in Union city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Union city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (164) | 0.5% (129) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (2,244) | 13.2% (3,681) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (1,823) | 7.8% (2,166) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (2,823) | 17.3% (4,828) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Union city
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 13.2% in Union city.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 7.8% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 17.3% in Union city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.