Demographics details for Lancaster, VA vs Rancho cucamonga, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, VA vs Rancho cucamonga, CA.

Data Lancaster Rancho cucamonga
Population 10,750 176,336
Median Age 59.2 years 37.5 years
Median Income $62,674 $105,534
Married Families 46.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 10% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.8

Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Rancho cucamonga

  • The population in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 176,336, compared to 10,750 in Lancaster.
  • Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 59.2 years compared to 37.5 years in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534, compared to $62,674 in Lancaster.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 46.0% compared to 42.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rancho cucamonga at 11%, compared to 10% in Lancaster.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.

Demographics

Demographics Lancaster vs Rancho cucamonga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lancaster Rancho cucamonga
Black 28 9
White 66 22
Asian 1 14
Hispanic 2 39
Two or More Races 3 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Rancho cucamonga

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 28% compared to 9% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 22% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 1% in Lancaster.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 2% in Lancaster.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rancho cucamonga at 15%, compared to 3% in Lancaster.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lancaster.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lancaster Rancho cucamonga
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 9.8%
Depression 22.2% 17.2%
Smoking 16.4% 10.0%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 16.6%
Obesity 37.3% 33.9%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Rancho cucamonga

  • More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 14.8% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 22.2% compared to 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 16.4% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Rancho cucamonga at 16.6% compared to 16.3% in Lancaster.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 37.3% compared to 33.9% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Rancho cucamonga.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lancaster Rancho cucamonga
No Schooling 1.5% (164) 1.2% (2,052)
High School Diploma 20.9% (2,244) 11.7% (20,590)
Less than High School 17.0% (1,823) 10.0% (17,566)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.3% (2,823) 25.3% (44,534)

Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Rancho cucamonga

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 11.7% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 25.3% in Rancho cucamonga.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.