Demographics details for Lancaster, VA vs Mukilteo, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, VA vs Mukilteo, WA.
| Data | Lancaster | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,750 | 21,096 |
| Median Age | 59.2 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $62,674 | $123,036 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Mukilteo
- The population in Mukilteo is higher at 21,096, compared to 10,750 in Lancaster.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 59.2 years compared to 43.6 years in Mukilteo.
- Mukilteo has a higher median income of $123,036, compared to $62,674 in Lancaster.
- In Mukilteo, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 46.0% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Mukilteo.
- Mukilteo has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Mukilteo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 1 |
| White | 66 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 21 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Mukilteo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 28% compared to 1% in Mukilteo.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 61% in Mukilteo.
- In Mukilteo, the Asian population stands at 21%, greater than 1% in Lancaster.
- Mukilteo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mukilteo at 11%, compared to 3% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Mukilteo at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 9.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 29.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Mukilteo
- More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 14.6% in Mukilteo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mukilteo at 26.5% versus 22.2% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 16.4% compared to 9.3% in Mukilteo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 16.3% compared to 15.7% in Mukilteo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 37.3% compared to 29.2% in Mukilteo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukilteo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (164) | 0.1% (24) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (2,244) | 9.7% (2,042) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (1,823) | 2.0% (414) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (2,823) | 38.3% (8,089) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Mukilteo
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.1% in Mukilteo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 9.7% in Mukilteo.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 2.0% in Mukilteo.
- In Mukilteo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 26.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.