Demographics details for Lancaster, VA vs Jessup, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, VA vs Jessup, MD.
| Data | Lancaster | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,750 | 9,602 |
| Median Age | 59.2 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $62,674 | $140,561 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Jessup
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 10,750, compared to 9,602 in Jessup.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 59.2 years compared to 36.8 years in Jessup.
- Jessup has a higher median income of $140,561, compared to $62,674 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 46.0% compared to 24.0% in Jessup.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Jessup.
- Jessup has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Jessup provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 54 |
| White | 66 | 24 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Jessup
- In Jessup, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 54% compared to 28% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 24% in Jessup.
- In Jessup, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Lancaster.
- Jessup has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jessup at 6%, compared to 3% in Lancaster.
- In Jessup, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lancaster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 13.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 15.4% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 2.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Jessup
- More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 13.7% in Jessup.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 22.2% compared to 15.4% in Jessup.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 16.4% compared to 15.0% in Jessup.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jessup at 16.8% compared to 16.3% in Lancaster.
- Jessup has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 37.3% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 17.0% compared to 2.0% in Jessup.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (164) | 1.5% (143) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (2,244) | 15.1% (1,453) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (1,823) | 24.7% (2,373) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (2,823) | 18.3% (1,760) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Jessup
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Lancaster and Jessup at 1.5%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 15.1% in Jessup.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jessup at 24.7%, compared to 17.0% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 18.3% in Jessup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.