Demographics details for Lancaster, VA vs Goliad, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, VA vs Goliad, TX.
| Data | Lancaster | Goliad |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,750 | 7,131 |
| Median Age | 59.2 years | 44.7 years |
| Median Income | $62,674 | $58,125 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Goliad
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 10,750, compared to 7,131 in Goliad.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 59.2 years compared to 44.7 years in Goliad.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $62,674 compared to $58,125 in Goliad.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 46.0% compared to 42.0% in Goliad.
- The poverty level is higher in Goliad at 12%, compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- Goliad has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Goliad provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Goliad |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 5 |
| White | 66 | 46 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 36 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Goliad
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 28% compared to 5% in Goliad.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 46% in Goliad.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 1% compared to 0% in Goliad.
- Goliad has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Goliad at 13%, compared to 3% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Goliad at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Goliad |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 37.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Goliad
- In Goliad, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.4% in Lancaster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Goliad at 22.9% versus 22.2% in Lancaster.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Lancaster and Goliad at 16.4%.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Goliad at 18.5% compared to 16.3% in Lancaster.
- Goliad has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 37.3% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Lancaster and Goliad at 17.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Goliad |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (164) | 0.6% (44) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (2,244) | 18.7% (1,337) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (1,823) | 21.3% (1,516) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (2,823) | 12.6% (900) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Goliad
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.6% in Goliad.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 18.7% in Goliad.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Goliad at 21.3%, compared to 17.0% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 12.6% in Goliad.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.