Demographics details for Lancaster, VA vs Ayden, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, VA vs Ayden, NC.
| Data | Lancaster | Ayden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,750 | 5,049 |
| Median Age | 59.2 years | 44.7 years |
| Median Income | $62,674 | $53,000 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Ayden
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 10,750, compared to 5,049 in Ayden.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 59.2 years compared to 44.7 years in Ayden.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $62,674 compared to $53,000 in Ayden.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 46.0% compared to 39.0% in Ayden.
- The poverty level is higher in Ayden at 17%, compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- Ayden has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Ayden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Ayden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 37 |
| White | 66 | 48 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Ayden
- In Ayden, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 37% compared to 28% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 48% in Ayden.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 1% compared to 0% in Ayden.
- Ayden has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ayden at 4%, compared to 3% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Ayden at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Ayden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.8% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Ayden
- In Ayden, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.4% in Lancaster.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 22.2%.
- Ayden has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 16.4% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 16.3% compared to 14.0% in Ayden.
- Ayden has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 37.3% in Lancaster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ayden at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Ayden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (164) | 3.1% (154) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (2,244) | 20.7% (1,046) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (1,823) | 14.8% (748) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (2,823) | 14.1% (712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Ayden
- In Ayden, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.5% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 20.7% in Ayden.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 14.8% in Ayden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 14.1% in Ayden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.