Demographics details for Lancaster, SC vs Troy, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, SC vs Troy, PA.
Data | Lancaster | Troy |
---|---|---|
Population | 104,577 | 1,246 |
Median Age | 42.2 years | 41.2 years |
Median Income | $72,186 | $47,992 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 54.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Troy
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 104,577, compared to 1,246 in Troy.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 41.2 years in Troy.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $72,186 compared to $47,992 in Troy.
- In Troy, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 42.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Troy at 12%, compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.5% in Troy.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Troy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lancaster | Troy |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 3 |
White | 70 | 71 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Troy
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 18% compared to 3% in Troy.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Troy at 71% compared to 70% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 2% compared to 1% in Troy.
- Troy has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 6% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Troy at 13%, compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Troy at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lancaster | Troy |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 12.1% |
Depression | 22.0% | 25.3% |
Smoking | 16.9% | 21.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 41.4% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Troy
- In Troy, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.6% in Lancaster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Troy at 25.3% versus 22.0% in Lancaster.
- Troy has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 16.9% in Lancaster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Troy at 17.5% compared to 17.3% in Lancaster.
- Troy has higher obesity rates at 41.4% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Troy at 24.0% compared to 12.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lancaster | Troy |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (689) | 2.6% (33) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (16,691) | 37.6% (469) |
Less than High School | 12.5% (13,112) | 21.9% (273) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (21,156) | 20.7% (258) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Troy
- In Troy, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.7% in Lancaster.
- In Troy, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.6% compared to 16.0% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Troy at 21.9%, compared to 12.5% in Lancaster.
- In Troy, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 20.2% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.