Demographics details for Lancaster, SC vs Pharr, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, SC vs Pharr, TX.
| Data | Lancaster | Pharr |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,577 | 80,179 |
| Median Age | 42.2 years | 29.4 years |
| Median Income | $72,186 | $45,016 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 7.6 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Pharr
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 104,577, compared to 80,179 in Pharr.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 29.4 years in Pharr.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $72,186 compared to $45,016 in Pharr.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 42.0% compared to 34.0% in Pharr.
- The poverty level is higher in Pharr at 24%, compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- Pharr has a higher unemployment rate at 7.6% compared to 4.7% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Pharr provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Pharr |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 1 |
| White | 70 | -26 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 94 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 31 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Pharr
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 18% compared to 1% in Pharr.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to -26% in Pharr.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 2% compared to 0% in Pharr.
- Pharr has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 94%, compared to 6% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pharr at 31%, compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Pharr at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Pharr |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 16.5% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 45.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Pharr
- In Pharr, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.6% in Lancaster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 22.0% compared to 19.9% in Pharr.
- Pharr has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 17.3% compared to 15.8% in Pharr.
- Pharr has higher obesity rates at 45.4% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Pharr.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Pharr |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (689) | 2.1% (1,723) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (16,691) | 13.2% (10,587) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (13,112) | 33.7% (27,024) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (21,156) | 9.7% (7,741) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Pharr
- In Pharr, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 13.2% in Pharr.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pharr at 33.7%, compared to 12.5% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 9.7% in Pharr.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.