Demographics details for Lancaster, SC vs Higbee, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, SC vs Higbee, MO.
| Data | Lancaster | Higbee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,577 | 447 |
| Median Age | 42.2 years | 26.7 years |
| Median Income | $72,186 | $61,406 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Higbee
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 104,577, compared to 447 in Higbee.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 26.7 years in Higbee.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $72,186 compared to $61,406 in Higbee.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 42.0% compared to 39.0% in Higbee.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Higbee.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.2% in Higbee.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Higbee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Higbee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | Data is updating |
| White | 70 | 90 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Higbee
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 18% compared to 0% in Higbee.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Higbee at 90% compared to 70% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 2% compared to 0% in Higbee.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 6% compared to 4% in Higbee.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Higbee at 6%, compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Higbee at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Higbee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 27.4% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 40.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Higbee
- In Higbee, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.6% in Lancaster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Higbee at 27.4% versus 22.0% in Lancaster.
- Higbee has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 16.9% in Lancaster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Higbee at 17.4% compared to 17.3% in Lancaster.
- Higbee has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Higbee at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Higbee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (689) | 0.7% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (16,691) | 28.9% (129) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (13,112) | 16.1% (72) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (21,156) | 10.3% (46) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Higbee
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Lancaster and Higbee at 0.7%.
- In Higbee, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.9% compared to 16.0% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Higbee at 16.1%, compared to 12.5% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 10.3% in Higbee.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.