Demographics details for Lancaster, SC vs Harker heights, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, SC vs Harker heights, TX.

Data Lancaster Harker heights
Population 104,577 34,102
Median Age 42.2 years 34.5 years
Median Income $72,186 $72,258
Married Families 42.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 10% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 5.0

Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Harker heights

  • In Lancaster, the population is higher at 104,577, compared to 34,102 in Harker heights.
  • Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 34.5 years in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has a higher median income of $72,258, compared to $72,186 in Lancaster.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Harker heights.
  • Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.7% in Lancaster.

Demographics

Demographics Lancaster vs Harker heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lancaster Harker heights
Black 18 28
White 70 36
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 6 21
Two or More Races 4 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 18% in Lancaster.
  • Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 36% in Harker heights.
  • In Harker heights, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Lancaster.
  • Harker heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 6% in Lancaster.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harker heights at 11%, compared to 4% in Lancaster.
  • In Harker heights, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lancaster.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lancaster Harker heights
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.0% 10.8%
Depression 22.0% 22.5%
Smoking 16.9% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 17.3% 17.1%
Obesity 32.9% 37.1%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Harker heights

  • More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 16.5% in Harker heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Harker heights at 22.5% versus 22.0% in Lancaster.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 16.9% compared to 15.5% in Harker heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 17.3% compared to 17.1% in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harker heights at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Lancaster.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lancaster Harker heights
No Schooling 0.7% (689) 1.3% (448)
High School Diploma 16.0% (16,691) 11.6% (3,958)
Less than High School 12.5% (13,112) 10.3% (3,509)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.2% (21,156) 18.8% (6,403)

Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.7% in Lancaster.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 11.6% in Harker heights.
  • More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 12.5% compared to 10.3% in Harker heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 18.8% in Harker heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.