Demographics details for Lancaster, SC vs Fort valley, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, SC vs Fort valley, GA.
| Data | Lancaster | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,577 | 8,838 |
| Median Age | 42.2 years | 30.6 years |
| Median Income | $72,186 | $31,807 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 18.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Fort valley
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 104,577, compared to 8,838 in Fort valley.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $72,186 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 42.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.5% in Fort valley.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 70 |
| White | 70 | 18 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 18% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 2% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 6% in Lancaster.
- Both Lancaster and Fort valley have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Fort valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 46.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.6% in Lancaster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 22.0% compared to 19.5% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 16.9% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 17.3% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort valley at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (689) | 3.0% (267) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (16,691) | 13.9% (1,226) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (13,112) | 17.3% (1,527) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (21,156) | 10.8% (954) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.7% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort valley at 17.3%, compared to 12.5% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.