Demographics details for Lancaster, SC vs Burleson, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, SC vs Burleson, TX.
| Data | Lancaster | Burleson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,577 | 53,381 |
| Median Age | 42.2 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $72,186 | $87,312 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Burleson
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 104,577, compared to 53,381 in Burleson.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 35.4 years in Burleson.
- Burleson has a higher median income of $87,312, compared to $72,186 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 42.0% compared to 39.0% in Burleson.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Burleson.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.0% in Burleson.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Burleson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Burleson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 5 |
| White | 70 | 66 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Burleson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 18% compared to 5% in Burleson.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 66% in Burleson.
- Both Lancaster and Burleson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Burleson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 6% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Burleson at 10%, compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Burleson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Burleson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 33.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Burleson
- More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 16.5% in Burleson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Burleson at 23.3% versus 22.0% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 16.9% compared to 15.2% in Burleson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burleson at 19.8% compared to 17.3% in Lancaster.
- Burleson has higher obesity rates at 33.0% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Burleson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Burleson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (689) | 0.7% (389) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (16,691) | 14.5% (7,733) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (13,112) | 7.0% (3,744) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (21,156) | 16.7% (8,907) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Burleson
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Lancaster and Burleson at 0.7%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 14.5% in Burleson.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 12.5% compared to 7.0% in Burleson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 16.7% in Burleson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.