Demographics details for Lancaster, SC vs Bowie, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, SC vs Bowie, MD.
| Data | Lancaster | Bowie |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,577 | 57,192 |
| Median Age | 42.2 years | 43.2 years |
| Median Income | $72,186 | $138,797 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Bowie
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 104,577, compared to 57,192 in Bowie.
- The median age in Bowie is higher at 43.2 years, compared to 42.2 years in Lancaster.
- Bowie has a higher median income of $138,797, compared to $72,186 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 42.0% compared to 41.0% in Bowie.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Bowie.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 4.7%, compared to 2.8% in Bowie.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Bowie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Bowie |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 58 |
| White | 70 | 24 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Bowie
- In Bowie, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 18% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 24% in Bowie.
- In Bowie, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Lancaster.
- Bowie has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 6% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bowie at 7%, compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Bowie at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Bowie |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 12.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 13.3% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 8.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Bowie
- More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 12.4% in Bowie.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 22.0% compared to 13.3% in Bowie.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 16.9% compared to 8.7% in Bowie.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 17.3% compared to 13.6% in Bowie.
- Bowie has higher obesity rates at 35.1% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Bowie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Bowie |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (689) | 0.9% (531) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (16,691) | 12.2% (6,950) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (13,112) | 5.9% (3,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (21,156) | 35.9% (20,525) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Bowie
- In Bowie, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 12.2% in Bowie.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 12.5% compared to 5.9% in Bowie.
- In Bowie, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.9% compared to 20.2% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.