Demographics details for Lancaster, SC vs Abilene, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, SC vs Abilene, TX.
Data | Lancaster | Abilene |
---|---|---|
Population | 104,577 | 127,385 |
Median Age | 42.2 years | 32.2 years |
Median Income | $72,186 | $59,254 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Abilene
- The population in Abilene is higher at 127,385, compared to 104,577 in Lancaster.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 32.2 years in Abilene.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $72,186 compared to $59,254 in Abilene.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lancaster at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Abilene.
- The poverty level is higher in Abilene at 12%, compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.0% in Abilene.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Abilene provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lancaster | Abilene |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 10 |
White | 70 | 49 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 6 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Abilene
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 18% compared to 10% in Abilene.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 49% in Abilene.
- Both Lancaster and Abilene have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Abilene has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 6% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Abilene at 12%, compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Abilene at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lancaster | Abilene |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 17.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 12.5% |
Depression | 22.0% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 16.9% | 18.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 18.3% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 35.8% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Abilene
- In Abilene, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.6% in Lancaster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Abilene at 22.8% versus 22.0% in Lancaster.
- Abilene has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 16.9% in Lancaster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Abilene at 18.3% compared to 17.3% in Lancaster.
- Abilene has higher obesity rates at 35.8% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Abilene at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lancaster | Abilene |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (689) | 0.9% (1,096) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (16,691) | 13.7% (17,400) |
Less than High School | 12.5% (13,112) | 13.7% (17,433) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (21,156) | 16.0% (20,428) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Abilene
- In Abilene, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 13.7% in Abilene.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Abilene at 13.7%, compared to 12.5% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 16.0% in Abilene.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.