Demographics details for Lancaster, PA vs Southlake, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, PA vs Southlake, TX.
| Data | Lancaster | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,453 | 31,102 |
| Median Age | 31.8 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $61,014 | $250,001 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Southlake
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 57,453, compared to 31,102 in Southlake.
- The median age in Southlake is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 31.8 years in Lancaster.
- Southlake has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $61,014 in Lancaster.
- In Southlake, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 28.0% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Southlake.
- Southlake has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.9% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Southlake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 1 |
| White | 24 | 68 |
| Asian | 3 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 40 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Southlake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 18% compared to 1% in Southlake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Southlake at 68% compared to 24% in Lancaster.
- In Southlake, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 3% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 40% compared to 9% in Southlake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 15% compared to 5% in Southlake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Southlake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 12.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 7.2% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 27.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Southlake
- More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 12.8% in Southlake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 21.8% compared to 21.3% in Southlake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 20.4% compared to 8.4% in Southlake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Southlake at 19.4% compared to 14.9% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 41.1% compared to 27.1% in Southlake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Southlake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (1,077) | 0.0% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 16.7% (9,588) | 4.2% (1,302) |
| Less than High School | 18.6% (10,712) | 1.3% (392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (10,012) | 46.0% (14,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Southlake
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Southlake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 4.2% in Southlake.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 18.6% compared to 1.3% in Southlake.
- In Southlake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.0% compared to 17.4% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.