Demographics details for Lancaster, PA vs Central point, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, PA vs Central point, OR.
Data | Lancaster | Central point |
---|---|---|
Population | 57,453 | 19,222 |
Median Age | 31.8 years | 40.3 years |
Median Income | $61,014 | $79,731 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Central point
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 57,453, compared to 19,222 in Central point.
- The median age in Central point is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 31.8 years in Lancaster.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731, compared to $61,014 in Lancaster.
- In Central point, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 28.0% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Central point.
- Central point has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.9% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lancaster | Central point |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | Data is updating |
White | 24 | 76 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 40 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Central point
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 18% compared to 0% in Central point.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central point at 76% compared to 24% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Lancaster at 3% compared to 1% in Central point.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lancaster at 40% compared to 15% in Central point.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lancaster at 15% compared to 7% in Central point.
- In Central point, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lancaster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lancaster | Central point |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 12.0% |
Depression | 21.8% | 29.4% |
Smoking | 20.4% | 16.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 30.1% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Central point
- In Central point, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.3% in Lancaster.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 21.8% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 20.4% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central point at 16.5% compared to 14.9% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 41.1% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lancaster | Central point |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.9% (1,077) | 1.7% (319) |
High School Diploma | 16.7% (9,588) | 16.1% (3,095) |
Less than High School | 18.6% (10,712) | 13.2% (2,530) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (10,012) | 15.6% (3,003) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Central point
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.7% in Central point.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 18.6% compared to 13.2% in Central point.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 15.6% in Central point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.