Demographics details for Lancaster, OH vs South river, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, OH vs South river, NJ.
| Data | Lancaster | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,174 | 15,990 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $52,716 | $95,981 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs South river
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 41,174, compared to 15,990 in South river.
- Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 37.1 years in South river.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981, compared to $52,716 in Lancaster.
- In South river, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 34.0% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in South river.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in South river.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs South river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 7 |
| White | 92 | 50 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs South river
- In South river, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 50% in South river.
- In South river, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Lancaster.
- South river has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South river at 7%, compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- In South river, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lancaster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 46.7% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs South river
- More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 26.1% compared to 21.0% in South river.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 23.5% compared to 14.6% in South river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 19.2% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 46.7% compared to 31.6% in South river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in South river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | South river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (125) | 2.5% (394) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (10,487) | 18.7% (2,985) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (4,399) | 20.6% (3,292) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (5,740) | 18.9% (3,025) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs South river
- In South river, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.3% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 18.7% in South river.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South river at 20.6%, compared to 10.7% in Lancaster.
- In South river, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 13.9% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.