Demographics details for Lancaster, OH vs Sherwood, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, OH vs Sherwood, AR.
| Data | Lancaster | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,174 | 33,082 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $52,716 | $74,917 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Sherwood
- In Lancaster, the population is higher at 41,174, compared to 33,082 in Sherwood.
- The median age in Sherwood is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 38.4 years in Lancaster.
- Sherwood has a higher median income of $74,917, compared to $52,716 in Lancaster.
- In Sherwood, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 34.0% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Sherwood.
- The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.3% in Sherwood.
Demographics
Demographics Lancaster vs Sherwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lancaster | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 28 |
| White | 92 | 64 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Sherwood
- In Sherwood, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 64% in Sherwood.
- Both Lancaster and Sherwood have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Sherwood has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- Both Lancaster and Sherwood have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Sherwood at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lancaster | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 46.7% | 35.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Sherwood
- More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.8% in Sherwood.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 26.1% compared to 23.9% in Sherwood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 23.5% compared to 18.0% in Sherwood.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lancaster at 19.2% compared to 14.6% in Sherwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 46.7% compared to 35.7% in Sherwood.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Sherwood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lancaster | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (125) | 0.6% (212) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (10,487) | 13.9% (4,592) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (4,399) | 6.9% (2,280) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (5,740) | 22.9% (7,568) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Sherwood
- In Sherwood, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 13.9% in Sherwood.
- More residents in Lancaster have less than a high school education at 10.7% compared to 6.9% in Sherwood.
- In Sherwood, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 13.9% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.