Demographics details for Lancaster, OH vs Scott city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lancaster, OH vs Scott city, KS.

Data Lancaster Scott city
Population 41,174 4,008
Median Age 38.4 years 36.0 years
Median Income $52,716 $47,217
Married Families 34.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.0

Population Comparison: Lancaster vs Scott city

  • In Lancaster, the population is higher at 41,174, compared to 4,008 in Scott city.
  • Residents in Lancaster have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 36.0 years in Scott city.
  • Lancaster has a higher median income of $52,716 compared to $47,217 in Scott city.
  • In Scott city, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 34.0% in Lancaster.
  • Lancaster has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Scott city.
  • The unemployment rate in Lancaster is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.0% in Scott city.

Demographics

Demographics Lancaster vs Scott city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lancaster Scott city
Black 1 Data is updating
White 92 69
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 2 25
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lancaster vs Scott city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lancaster at 1% compared to 0% in Scott city.
  • Lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 69% in Scott city.
  • Both Lancaster and Scott city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Scott city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 2% in Lancaster.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Scott city at 5%, compared to 4% in Lancaster.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lancaster and Scott city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lancaster Scott city
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 10.3%
Depression 26.1% 19.7%
Smoking 23.5% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 19.2%
Obesity 46.7% 38.1%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lancaster vs Scott city

  • More residents in Lancaster report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.6% in Scott city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lancaster at 26.1% compared to 19.7% in Scott city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lancaster at 23.5% compared to 17.6% in Scott city.
  • Binge drinking rates are similar in both Lancaster and Scott city at 19.2%.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lancaster at 46.7% compared to 38.1% in Scott city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lancaster at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Scott city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lancaster Scott city
No Schooling 0.3% (125) 2.9% (116)
High School Diploma 25.5% (10,487) 13.5% (543)
Less than High School 10.7% (4,399) 24.2% (968)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.9% (5,740) 12.2% (490)

Education Levels Comparison: Lancaster vs Scott city

  • In Scott city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.3% in Lancaster.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 13.5% in Scott city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Scott city at 24.2%, compared to 10.7% in Lancaster.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lancaster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 12.2% in Scott city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.